Full Version: What Are The Root Causes Of Abortion?
You seem to take the moral high ground easily and rapidly when telling people what they can and can not demand when you so often do so yourself. Once again you have failed to live up to your own challenges of providing any information or debate. You obviously fail to recognise even simple sarcasm and or irony which may go some way to explain your inability to provide any cogent argument or response, in that you can not conduct 2nd or 3rd order analysuis on issues other than to either refute them with no evidence or choose to argue something eles, i.e. in this case becuae I have previouslty used sarcasm and irony I then ergo have no position to demand you to abide by the same requests that you demand of other posters. If there is anyone who needs to be labelled a hypocrite I would suggest young Jimmy you take a long hard look in the mirror. Your entire reponse (as has been previously pointed out by other posters) is based purely on refutation and quotes without any real substance to your argument than a personal opnion. Which as they say opinions are like aresholes, everyone has one.
QUOTE(Jimmy @ May 16 2007, 08:27 AM) 
QUOTE(LeftintheUS @ May 16 2007, 06:11 AM)
QUOTE(Jimmy @ May 14 2007, 03:57 PM)
QUOTE(LeftintheUS @ May 14 2007, 10:28 PM)
The way you can tell if you got the quote function to work is if within a post you see the word 'quote' within brackets where instead there should be a blue quote balloon, then you got the quote function wrong. If instead you actually see blue quote balloons you got the quote function right. My posts contains blue quote balloons, your post here does not -- no getting around that really. Another humiliating defeat for you!!
No, there is nothing wrong with the quotes in that post.
Silly you, how many more incorrect comments can you make?
Are there quote balloons in the post you posted? No. Are there quote balloons in the post I posted that you accused me of quoting incorrectly? Yes!! Yet another painfully humiliating defeat for Jimmy!! Too bad, poor, poor Jimmy!
I'm guessing that you keep trading off between arguing this and the one where you claimed "Never have so many abortions ever taken place" and then in the next few posts showed other times when more abortions have taken place because you are trying to mask the time you suggested that someone shouldn't debate abortion because of their understanding of biology, and then in the very next post sarcastically criticized biologists.
I like the effort, but seriously, the more you try to focus on the others, the more I start to laugh on the one you are masking. Someone shouldn't debate abortion because of their understanding of biology, indeed!! Jimmy you are hours and hours of entertainment. Colbert would truly be so pround of. And, so am I. It's not easy to keep in character like you have. Hats off to you Jimmy, you are doing more for the pro-choice side than you probably even intended!! Please keep it up. This really great stuff. I'm going to have to save it on my hard drive because it is classic material!! Truly classic!!!
(Yes, that was three exclamation points, I only rarely do that, but you are worth it Jimmy. You really are!)
You are wrong again LeftintheUS!
Much better, Jimmy!! That is way more in character!! A perfect method #7. It's exactly what I would have done in that character. Pure comedic genius! I love it. Like I said, no one can argue the pro choice point of view as well as you do. Just to reiterate, my favorites are (in order of there hilarity):
1. You accuse me of not understanding the quote function when you totally botched (yes, this is back at number 1 for me)!
2. You claim "Never have so many abortions ever taken place" and then in the next few posts show other times when more abortions have taken place (great stuff, but it has fallen to number 2).
3. You suggest that someone shouldn't debate abortion because of their understanding of biology, and then in the very next post you sarcastically criticize biologists (I know you want this to be number 1, but it isn't there yet).
All in all, very funny stuff! And, all in all, a totally humiliating defeat and failure for Jimmy!!
QUOTE(LeftintheUS @ May 17 2007, 06:16 AM)
All in all, very funny stuff! And, all in all, a totally humiliating defeat and failure for Jimmy!!
You refuse to debate the issue with me, you have conceded, so why are you still here?
QUOTE(I Turned Out a Punk @ May 17 2007, 04:40 AM)
You seem to take the moral high ground easily and rapidly when telling people what they can and can not demand when you so often do so yourself. Once again you have failed to live up to your own challenges of providing any information or debate. You obviously fail to recognise even simple sarcasm and or irony which may go some way to explain your inability to provide any cogent argument or response, in that you can not conduct 2nd or 3rd order analysuis on issues other than to either refute them with no evidence or choose to argue something eles, i.e. in this case becuae I have previouslty used sarcasm and irony I then ergo have no position to demand you to abide by the same requests that you demand of other posters. If there is anyone who needs to be labelled a hypocrite I would suggest young Jimmy you take a long hard look in the mirror. Your entire reponse (as has been previously pointed out by other posters) is based purely on refutation and quotes without any real substance to your argument than a personal opnion. Which as they say opinions are like aresholes, everyone has one.
You are not in a position to tell me these things, look at your first and second post.
please stop talking to this automaton
QUOTE(Jimmy @ May 17 2007, 03:36 PM)
QUOTE(LeftintheUS @ May 17 2007, 06:16 AM)
All in all, very funny stuff! And, all in all, a totally humiliating defeat and failure for Jimmy!!
You refuse to debate the issue with me, you have conceded, so why are you still here?
QUOTE(I Turned Out a Punk @ May 17 2007, 04:40 AM)
You seem to take the moral high ground easily and rapidly when telling people what they can and can not demand when you so often do so yourself. Once again you have failed to live up to your own challenges of providing any information or debate. You obviously fail to recognise even simple sarcasm and or irony which may go some way to explain your inability to provide any cogent argument or response, in that you can not conduct 2nd or 3rd order analysuis on issues other than to either refute them with no evidence or choose to argue something eles, i.e. in this case becuae I have previouslty used sarcasm and irony I then ergo have no position to demand you to abide by the same requests that you demand of other posters. If there is anyone who needs to be labelled a hypocrite I would suggest young Jimmy you take a long hard look in the mirror. Your entire reponse (as has been previously pointed out by other posters) is based purely on refutation and quotes without any real substance to your argument than a personal opnion. Which as they say opinions are like aresholes, everyone has one.
You are not in a position to tell me these things, look at your first and second post.
Either are you in any position to demand other posters debate with you when you are incapable of intelligent discussion or debate!
You have clearly displayed lack of any analytical skills to ( and I repeat this again) recognise sarcasm and irony. My first two posts were loaded with them, for the slow of reading Jimmy I was having a go at you!! Taking the piss!!!
You continually barrage other posters with requests for them to debate/argue/provide evidence, yet do not provide any yourself.
Here is a simple challenge/request/demand ( and yes I know your immediate response will be "follow the threads") but for everyone here can we have in simple english and be enlightened by:
the outline of your argument
why is abortion genocide
what is your definition of genocide
why do the unwanted and unborn constitute an ethnic group.
I think if your clearly and succinctly articulated these areas you would at least allay some peoples concerns that you are infantile.
If your immediate response is:
a. havent you been following the thread
b. I have already said this
c. you are in no position to demand
d. a combination of all of the above
you really will cement yourself in peoples mind as an infantile twat
For me he already is one.
stop feeding the troll
QUOTE(I Turned Out a Punk @ May 17 2007, 08:08 AM)
QUOTE(Jimmy @ May 17 2007, 03:36 PM)
QUOTE(LeftintheUS @ May 17 2007, 06:16 AM)
All in all, very funny stuff! And, all in all, a totally humiliating defeat and failure for Jimmy!!
You refuse to debate the issue with me, you have conceded, so why are you still here?
QUOTE(I Turned Out a Punk @ May 17 2007, 04:40 AM)
You seem to take the moral high ground easily and rapidly when telling people what they can and can not demand when you so often do so yourself. Once again you have failed to live up to your own challenges of providing any information or debate. You obviously fail to recognise even simple sarcasm and or irony which may go some way to explain your inability to provide any cogent argument or response, in that you can not conduct 2nd or 3rd order analysuis on issues other than to either refute them with no evidence or choose to argue something eles, i.e. in this case becuae I have previouslty used sarcasm and irony I then ergo have no position to demand you to abide by the same requests that you demand of other posters. If there is anyone who needs to be labelled a hypocrite I would suggest young Jimmy you take a long hard look in the mirror. Your entire reponse (as has been previously pointed out by other posters) is based purely on refutation and quotes without any real substance to your argument than a personal opnion. Which as they say opinions are like aresholes, everyone has one.
You are not in a position to tell me these things, look at your first and second post.
Either are you in any position to demand other posters debate with you when you are incapable of intelligent discussion or debate!
You have clearly displayed lack of any analytical skills to ( and I repeat this again) recognise sarcasm and irony. My first two posts were loaded with them, for the slow of reading Jimmy I was having a go at you!! Taking the piss!!!
You continually barrage other posters with requests for them to debate/argue/provide evidence, yet do not provide any yourself.
Here is a simple challenge/request/demand ( and yes I know your immediate response will be "follow the threads") but for everyone here can we have in simple english and be enlightened by:
the outline of your argument
why is abortion genocide
what is your definition of genocide
why do the unwanted and unborn constitute an ethnic group.
I think if your clearly and succinctly articulated these areas you would at least allay some peoples concerns that you are infantile.
If your immediate response is:
a. havent you been following the thread
b. I have already said this
c. you are in no position to demand
d. a combination of all of the above
you really will cement yourself in peoples mind as an infantile twat
Why should I repeat myself many times for your benefit?
The answers to your questions are in the thread.
Looks like option d. to me.
QUOTE(Jimmy @ May 16 2007, 10:36 PM)
QUOTE(LeftintheUS @ May 17 2007, 06:16 AM)
All in all, very funny stuff! And, all in all, a totally humiliating defeat and failure for Jimmy!!
You refuse to debate the issue with me, you have conceded, so why are you still here?
Another power post? Come on, Jimmy, that is so out of character. I like the big "mistakes" much better (yes I realize you are just peeling back the curtain a bit with those) but they are so damn funny. Why not try another one of those, they are great!! That being said, Jimmy, you have been utterly defeated and embarassed one more time!!
QUOTE(LeftintheUS @ May 17 2007, 04:35 PM)
Another power post? Come on, Jimmy, that is so out of character. I like the big "mistakes" much better (yes I realize you are just peeling back the curtain a bit with those) but they are so damn funny. Why not try another one of those, they are great!! That being said, Jimmy, you have been utterly defeated and embarassed one more time!!
How can I be defeated when I'm willing to debate, yet you refuse to debate, that is an odd logical conclusion.
QUOTE(Jimmy @ May 17 2007, 09:04 AM)
QUOTE(LeftintheUS @ May 17 2007, 04:35 PM)
Another power post? Come on, Jimmy, that is so out of character. I like the big "mistakes" much better (yes I realize you are just peeling back the curtain a bit with those) but they are so damn funny. Why not try another one of those, they are great!! That being said, Jimmy, you have been utterly defeated and embarassed one more time!!
How can I be defeated when I'm willing to debate, yet you refuse to debate, that is an odd logical conclusion.
You don't really do any actual debate. That would require getting too far out of character. It's okay, you don't have to put up that front anymore with me. I appreciate you for what you are...
QUOTE(LeftintheUS @ May 17 2007, 05:15 PM)
QUOTE(Jimmy @ May 17 2007, 09:04 AM)
QUOTE(LeftintheUS @ May 17 2007, 04:35 PM)
Another power post? Come on, Jimmy, that is so out of character. I like the big "mistakes" much better (yes I realize you are just peeling back the curtain a bit with those) but they are so damn funny. Why not try another one of those, they are great!! That being said, Jimmy, you have been utterly defeated and embarassed one more time!!
How can I be defeated when I'm willing to debate, yet you refuse to debate, that is an odd logical conclusion.
You don't really do any actual debate. That would require getting too far out of character. It's okay, you don't have to put up that front anymore with me. I appreciate you for what you are...
Incorrect.
How can I be defeated when I'm willing to debate, yet you refuse to debate, that is an odd logical conclusion.
What, specifically, are you willing to debate, Jimmy?
QUOTE(Jimmy @ May 17 2007, 10:33 AM)
QUOTE(LeftintheUS @ May 17 2007, 05:15 PM)
You don't really do any actual debate. That would require getting too far out of character. It's okay, you don't have to put up that front anymore with me. I appreciate you for what you are...
Incorrect.
How can I be defeated when I'm willing to debate, yet you refuse to debate, that is an odd logical conclusion.
You are willing to argue. You are not willing to debate. There is a fundamental difference between the two, as I am sure you know. But, we've been over all of that before -- no real need to re-hash it at this point. Suffice to say, I appreciate you much more, now that I understand the Jimmy character, the one where:
1. You accuse me of not understanding the quote function when you totally botched it!
2. You claim "Never have so many abortions ever taken place" and then in the next few posts show other times when more abortions have taken place.
3. You suggest that someone shouldn't debate abortion because of their understanding of biology, and then in the very next post you sarcastically criticize biologists.
That is simply good comedy, Jimmy. And, I, for one it appears (though I think Zippy is begining to pick up on it now too as he has a keen wit for humor) appreciate how you try to bring humor into our lives!!
Another crushing blow for Jimmy, I'm afraid!
STOP FEEDING THE TROLL...
QUOTE(LeftintheUS @ May 17 2007, 06:16 AM)
1. You accuse me of not understanding the quote function
2. You claim "Never have so many abortions ever taken place" and then in the next few posts show other times when more abortions have taken place.
3. you sarcastically criticize biologists.
1. False, I said: "fail to use the quote function properly".
2. How does that detract from the premise?
3. False, I said good for biologists.
.......................and you still offer no debate.
(or frog based research)
(or frog based research)
QUOTE(Jimmy @ May 18 2007, 02:04 AM)
QUOTE(LeftintheUS @ May 17 2007, 04:35 PM)
Another power post? Come on, Jimmy, that is so out of character. I like the big "mistakes" much better (yes I realize you are just peeling back the curtain a bit with those) but they are so damn funny. Why not try another one of those, they are great!! That being said, Jimmy, you have been utterly defeated and embarassed one more time!!
How can I be defeated when I'm willing to debate, yet you refuse to debate, that is an odd logical conclusion.
You have to be kidding, when a few post earlier when asked to explain your position you simply replied why should I repeat myself.
I would argue that you need to repeat yourself purely for the fact that you have never offered a real argument, just a position based on your opinion that abortion is genocide, backed up with some flimsy and pathetic attempts at defining; genocide, ethnicity etc etc. When some quite intelligent people have offered different stances with different definitions you fail to discuss the issue but merely reute on the basis that you are right and eveyone else is wrong.
When challenged again ( even after I stated that your likely response was to be , denyy a position, argue something else, state that you have already expressed a view) you have proven that you do not want to debate or argue merely refute everyone else with childlike responses. My only guess is you have no cogent comebacks, are withering in the morass of defeat and your only option is to keep carrying on like a complete plonker.
QUOTE(Jimmy @ May 17 2007, 02:15 PM)
1. False, I said: "fail to use the quote function properly".
Thanks, Jimmy, you are so accommodating. I was right to keep them in the order I did. I am practically in tears now from laughing so hard!! I love how you went back and edited the post in which you screwed up the quote function. I'll admit, I don't blame you for doing so. You must have been truly embarassed! That was one of the finest pieces of internet hilarity I've ever seen. It was funny how you continued denying it over and over and then gave up and edited it! That was the best part! That was how I figured out "Jimmy" was a character of your creation -- and a damned funny one. Never has the pro-choice side of the debate been given such a gift!
I know Leontien is frustrated with you, Jimmy. Between us, Jimmy, I'm not sure she sees that you are acting like you are one side of the debate, but by intentionally making so many stupid claims and blunders, you are actually effectively making the case for the other side of the debate. Not everyone picks up on that kind of irony, for example I Turned Out a Punk hasn't picked up on it yet, but I think Zippy has -- he has a really good sense of humor. They will understand in time that you don't intend for people to actually believe anything you write.
In the meantime, I would merely note that you have been resoundingly trounced once again!
QUOTE(LeftintheUS @ May 18 2007, 08:03 AM)
QUOTE(Jimmy @ May 17 2007, 02:15 PM)
1. False, I said: "fail to use the quote function properly".
Thanks, Jimmy, you are so accommodating. I was right to keep them in the order I did. I am practically in tears now from laughing so hard!! I love how you went back and edited the post in which you screwed up the quote function. I'll admit, I don't blame you for doing so. You must have been truly embarassed! That was one of the finest pieces of internet hilarity I've ever seen. It was funny how you continued denying it over and over and then gave up and edited it! That was the best part! That was how I figured out "Jimmy" was a character of your creation -- and a damned funny one. Never has the pro-choice side of the debate been given such a gift!
I know Leontien is frustrated with you, Jimmy. Between us, Jimmy, I'm not sure she sees that you are acting like you are one side of the debate, but by intentionally making so many stupid claims and blunders, you are actually effectively making the case for the other side of the debate. Not everyone picks up on that kind of irony, for example I Turned Out a Punk hasn't picked up on it yet, but I think Zippy has -- he has a really good sense of humor. They will understand in time that you don't intend for people to actually believe anything you write.
In the meantime, I would merely note that you have been resoundingly trounced once again!
How thoroughly post modern. Is Jimmy a copy of an original without an original a simulacrum?
QUOTE(I Turned Out a Punk @ May 17 2007, 03:14 PM)
How thoroughly post modern. Is Jimmy a copy of an original without an original a simulacrum?
I had a feeling you would pick up on it fairly quickly!! Not every one was looking in the right direction when Toto pulled back the curtain!!
QUOTE(LeftintheUS @ May 17 2007, 11:03 PM)
You must have been truly embarassed!
Ah, I see what you are trying to say, you mean: embarrassed.
Well I'm not, but you should be, spelling like that.
So Jimmy
assuming that you are not a postmodern amalgam of self conscious thought existing in hyperspace, are you going to respond in the affirmative to any of my requests, or once again prove your total incapacity to have an intelligent discussion with the simple refutation
I have already done so.
It would only better serve your purposes to once and for all clearly spell out your position, which from what I can determine by examining the previous threads, is pretty flimsy and is reliant on statment and opinion and some fairly shoddy use of statistics (as pointed out continuously by Left in the USA).
The challenge is to you
The response "why should I" just indicates a base level self indulgent stupidity. It could be deemed arrogant if you had a decent position in the first place, but owing to the distinct lack of credibility in your statements assertions and statistics I am willing to say that you are not really serious about serious debat at all.
Prove me wrong.
I challenge you.
If you fail to you lose!
assuming that you are not a postmodern amalgam of self conscious thought existing in hyperspace, are you going to respond in the affirmative to any of my requests, or once again prove your total incapacity to have an intelligent discussion with the simple refutation
I have already done so.
It would only better serve your purposes to once and for all clearly spell out your position, which from what I can determine by examining the previous threads, is pretty flimsy and is reliant on statment and opinion and some fairly shoddy use of statistics (as pointed out continuously by Left in the USA).
The challenge is to you
The response "why should I" just indicates a base level self indulgent stupidity. It could be deemed arrogant if you had a decent position in the first place, but owing to the distinct lack of credibility in your statements assertions and statistics I am willing to say that you are not really serious about serious debat at all.
Prove me wrong.
I challenge you.
If you fail to you lose!
QUOTE(Jimmy @ May 17 2007, 05:40 PM)
QUOTE(LeftintheUS @ May 17 2007, 11:03 PM)
You must have been truly embarassed!
Ah, I see what you are trying to say, you mean: embarrassed.
Well I'm not, but you should be, spelling like that.
Resorting to criticizing spelling, the last vestige of the truly defeated. That might be the funniest thing yet!! You definately have some other great ones, but to criticize spelling on the internet, that surely takes the cake!! Jimmy you are the greatest. I'm sure the pro-choice side of the debate welcomes your contributions as much as I do!! Great, great stuff! But, it only proves how totally defeated and destroyed you are!!
P.S. I noticed your complete lack of defense of how you went back and edited the post where you screwed up the quote function. Point taken!! Good work!
Please stop feeding the troll...
...all we need now is a mention of hitler, or has that been done already Litus?...
anyone remember that popular beat combo back in the day called 'Johnny hates Jazz'?
yeah well. they reformed.
only now they are called...
jimmy hates jizz.
yeah well. they reformed.
only now they are called...
jimmy hates jizz.
Nevski - I was just about to post that!
Please boys - stop feeding the troll!
Please boys - stop feeding the troll!
QUOTE(LeftintheUS @ May 18 2007, 04:40 AM)
Jimmy you are the greatest.
Settled.
QUOTE(Sarah lady @ May 18 2007, 10:57 AM)
"Don't ask why the poor are poor, ask why the rich are rich" Tony Benn, Tolpuddle 2005
Why the rich are rich?
you mean you don't know?
QUOTE(Jimmy @ May 17 2007, 05:40 PM)
QUOTE(LeftintheUS @ May 17 2007, 11:03 PM)
You must have been truly embarassed!
Ah, I see what you are trying to say, you mean: embarrassed.
Well I'm not, but you should be, spelling like that.
QUOTE(Jimmy @ Apr 11 2007, 04:56 PM)
3.) I don't think that the contraception pill was availible in the medieval times, but yes that too can cause abortions.
QUOTE(Jimmy @ Apr 27 2007, 03:49 AM)
Another great intelectual comment made there, well done!
QUOTE(Jimmy @ Apr 28 2007, 06:25 AM)
You have made a string of claims, non have been proven, whereas I have shown the opposite is the more likely out come, since it is quite clear abortions continue to rise around the world, year on year.
QUOTE(Jimmy @ May 11 2007, 09:48 AM)
What benefit comes from legalising abortion and paving the way for millions of perfectly good people to die, on the premise that it is justified because you want to kill a baby afew days before it will die?
QUOTE(Jimmy @ May 13 2007, 08:09 AM)
Is that alls you've got?
QUOTE(Jimmy @ May 16 2007, 08:27 PM)
You are not in a position to tell me to discuss with clarity and alacrity, and neither can you tell me not to debate with mere refutation and idiocy, just read your first two post in this thread.
Jimmy. Glass houses. Stones. Ha ha ha!!
QUOTE(LeftintheUS @ May 18 2007, 05:16 PM)
Jimmy. Glass houses. Stones. Ha ha ha!!
Nice.
QUOTE(Jimmy @ May 18 2007, 10:07 AM)
QUOTE(LeftintheUS @ May 18 2007, 05:16 PM)
Jimmy. Glass houses. Stones. Ha ha ha!!
Nice.
My pleasure!
I've gotta move on, mostly because I don't want to annoy the other posters on this thread, who I like alot, eventhough they don't get you.
You take care, Jimmy!! That was fun, seriously!
'Night, Lefty. 'Night, Jimmy.
QUOTE(LeftintheUS @ May 18 2007, 06:32 PM)
I've gotta move on, mostly because I don't want to annoy the other posters on this thread...
Too late for that.
QUOTE(Jimmy @ May 18 2007, 03:53 PM)
QUOTE(LeftintheUS @ May 18 2007, 06:32 PM)
I've gotta move on, mostly because I don't want to annoy the other posters on this thread...
Too late for that.
They are an understanding bunch! Wonderful people all of them!!
Take care, Jimmy.
It's been fun.
Don't forget, abortion is genocide.
QUOTE(Jimmy @ May 19 2007, 09:08 AM)
Don't forget, abortion is genocide.
Knob
a portion of what?
QUOTE(Sarah lady @ May 18 2007, 10:57 AM)
stop feeding the troll!
If that is alls you are going to say, you might want to reconsider who it is that is being the real troll.
Abortion is genocide.
Are there any other challengers that dispute this claim?
Are there any other challengers that dispute this claim?
QUOTE(LeftintheUS @ May 18 2007, 06:32 PM)
QUOTE(Jimmy @ May 18 2007, 10:07 AM)
QUOTE(LeftintheUS @ May 18 2007, 05:16 PM)
Jimmy. Glass houses. Stones. Ha ha ha!!
Nice.
My pleasure!
I've gotta move on, mostly because I don't want to annoy the other posters on this thread, who I like alot, eventhough they don't get you.
You take care, Jimmy!! That was fun, seriously!
'Night, Lefty. 'Night, Jimmy.
Glass houses...
QUOTE(LeftintheUS @ May 18 2007, 04:40 AM)
Resorting to criticizing spelling, the last vestige of the truly defeated.
So you admit you are defeated then?
Ha ha ha. He he he. You've got a face like a chimpanzee.
Click to view attachment
(With apologies to Fungus)
Click to view attachment
(With apologies to Fungus)
Apparently doctors are allowed to "opt out" of performing abortions if they find it immoral or distasteful.
wonder how many use that to justify religious objections?
wonder how many use that to justify religious objections?
QUOTE(Jimmy @ May 20 2007, 08:01 AM)
Abortion is genocide.
Are there any other challengers that dispute this claim?
As you have been repeatedly asked yet you fail to deliver,
why is abortion genocide?
Is it genocide merely because you assert it is?
Or are you going to offer some evidence etc.
Or can I simply just say
"no it isnt"
QUOTE
Apparently doctors are allowed to "opt out" of performing abortions if they find it immoral or distasteful.
wonder how many use that to justify religious objections?
wonder how many use that to justify religious objections?
Not just performing abortions, but referring you for them. Your GP can simply say to you, "I can't help you, I'm a Catholic."
QUOTE(I Turned Out a Punk @ May 20 2007, 10:17 PM)
QUOTE(Jimmy @ May 20 2007, 08:01 AM)
Abortion is genocide.
Are there any other challengers that dispute this claim?
As you have been repeatedly asked yet you fail to deliver,
why is abortion genocide?
Is it genocide merely because you assert it is?
Or are you going to offer some evidence etc.
Or can I simply just say
"no it isnt"
Oh yes it is.
NO IT ISNT,
IS THIS THE RIGHT ROOM FOR AN ARGUMENT?
IS THIS THE RIGHT ROOM FOR AN ARGUMENT?
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.